There are some territorial differences, however.
Firstly, let's start with the front camera: all offer the UltraPixel on the front as a selfie camera, which we think is a smart move as it gives great results. The move from UltraPixel and Duo Camera on the rear for a straight-shooting 20-megapixel sensor, doesn't seem to have quite worked out.īut across these handsets, there's a blistering array of difference. If there was one area that the M9 really stumbled in our review, it was in the camera. Cameras: UltraPixels, Duo Camera, you name it That's likely to change however, especially with a move along from Qualcomm dominating the chips in all leading devices. Qualcomm is well known in the US and UK, but MediaTek less so, unless you're a smartphone fan. Moving to another chipset is likely to be about price and branding. All also accept microSD card for expansion, which is a handy option. In terms of storage, it seems that 32GB is also the standard, except the E9, which starts at 16GB, although these things differ by region. All should be speedy in operation, given that there's plenty of power. HTC's other devices here use MediaTek, all are 64-bit octo-core CPUs, and they all get 3GB of RAM, apart from the E9, which settles for 2GB. It's not all top-level Qualcomm any more - the LG G4 takes a Snapdragon 808, Samsung used its own Exynos.Įxcept the HTC One M9, which takes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 chipset and pairs it with 3GB of RAM to good effect and rather predictably. If there's one thing that's noticeably different in 2015, it's how manufacturers are selecting the hardware to power devices. Of all these devices, it's likely to be the M9+ and ME that are seen as the most progressive, although resolution and size isn't all that matters in a smartphone display. The One E9, settles for 1920 x 1080 at 5.5-inches, which will be the softest of the lot. But the One E9+ also offers 2560 x 1440 pixels, this time at 5.5-inches, the same as the LG G4, with 534ppi. Yes, that's incredibly sharp, offering a Quad HD display. It's the smallest of our selection, as both the HTC One M9+ and the One ME have a 5.2-inch display and both offer 2560 x 1440 pixels, for 564ppi, which is much more "next-gen" on paper at least. That's the same as the M8 was last year, a good size with a good resolution.īut it's not a display that anyone is going to be getting excited about, not when others (Samsung, LG) are pushing size and pixels. The HTC One M9 has a 1920 x 1080 pixel resolution, at 5-inches.
Only the M9 is available globally, the other handsets are available across Asia in various countries.
#Htc one m9 review vs lg v10 android#
It adopts much of the skill of the One M9+ on the front, but with the E9+ rear, more or less.Īll these devices run Android and HTC Sense, although there's different services available in different territories. As the name suggests, this is sort of a fusion of the M and E class of devices. Of these two, the E9+ is the higher spec device. These are the "plastic ones", but their size means they're really pushing into phablet territory.
#Htc one m9 review vs lg v10 full#
But then there's the One M9+, which offers much the same - a premium full metal body design, with exquisite attention to detail - but steps up in size and functions. HTC say that the One M9 is the flagship, the lead device. We've reviewed the HTC One M9, but here's the rundown of how HTC's other top devices compare. Luxury design, new components, a revised Sense experience all fused together as the handset to set 2015 alight.īut HTC's plans globally don't reflect those we see in the UK or the US, with a number of other handsets appearing in Asia, presenting a number of alternatives that many of us will never be able to buy. (Pocket-lint) - HTC launched the One M9 as its new flagship handset.
0 kommentar(er)
